The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

Learn more

Somewhere in New York right now, someone is making money because they correctly predicted that a specific word would be said during a corporate earnings call.

Not the stock price. Not the quarterly revenue. The exact word.

On the other side of that trade, someone lost money because the word was not said.

This is not a niche internet quirk anymore. This is a $44 billion industry that grew over 1000% in a single year and is now showing up on CNN, the Wall Street Journal, and the Golden Globe awards broadcast.

It is called prediction markets. And once you understand how it works, you will start seeing it everywhere.

The idea is surprisingly simple.

A prediction market is a platform where you buy and sell contracts based on whether something will happen or not. Every contract is priced between zero and one dollar, representing the probability the market collectively believes that event will occur.

If a contract is trading at 70 cents, the market is saying there is a 70% chance that event happens. If you buy it at 70 cents and the event happens, you collect one dollar. If it does not happen, you lose your 70 cents. If you think the market is wrong and the real probability is lower, you sell the contract and profit if it does not happen.

Prediction markets aim to aggregate collective insight to create informed probabilities across topics. The wisdom of the crowd concept suggests that collective forecasting can be more accurate and reliable than the opinion of any individual expert.

That is the theory. In practice it has become something far wilder and more interesting.

This is not a small experiment happening in the corner of the internet.

Total notional trading volume reached over $44 billion in 2025, with Polymarket and Kalshi generating around 85 to 90% of that total. By the end of 2025, even outside major election periods, monthly volume remained above $13 billion, setting a much higher starting point for 2026 than in earlier years.

To put that in perspective, that is more trading volume than many mid-sized stock exchanges.

As of February 2026, the total notional volume of the entire forecasting market was $127.5 billion, with 2.49 million unique users and open interest exceeding $1 billion. The prediction market is entering what some are calling its iPhone moment, with two companies each valued at over $10 billion jointly leading a new sector with an annual growth rate of over 1000%.

And it is not slowing down. Kalshi and Polymarket are each reportedly in discussions with investors about raising fresh capital at valuations near $20 billion, roughly double their valuations from late 2025. Kalshi alone saw more than $1 billion in trading volume on Super Bowl Sunday.

This is where it gets genuinely fascinating and a little bit strange.

The obvious ones are elections and sports. But the menu goes much deeper than that.

Users of Kalshi and Polymarket can bet on events major and minor, from politics to sports to culture to the weather. Recent markets have included whether certain words would be used during a company earnings call, whether Elon Musk would win his court case against OpenAI, and whether the highest temperature in Seattle on a particular day would fall within a certain range. Users have also bet on whether a specific Trump cabinet member would be the first to leave office and whether Jesus Christ would return before 2027.

Sports coverage is exploding too. March Madness 2026 is the first NCAA Tournament played fully in the prediction market era, with Kalshi alone clearing $60 million in trading volume on its championship futures market before a single first round game was played. Platforms are projecting $135 to $150 million in total handle over the full three weeks.

And mainstream media is fully on board now. CNN and CNBC have struck deals to incorporate Kalshi prediction markets into their coverage. The Wall Street Journal's owner Dow Jones is partnering with Polymarket, as did the Golden Globe awards, with announcers updating viewers on Polymarket odds before every commercial break.

Here is what separates prediction markets from regular gambling in the eyes of researchers and economists.

When millions of people put real money on an outcome, the aggregate price becomes an incredibly powerful signal about what is actually likely to happen. It is not one expert's opinion. It is the collective conviction of thousands of people who have skin in the game.

Core believers maintain that markets are the most efficient way to get to real information. Traditional polling and expert forecasting have repeatedly failed to predict major political events, and prediction markets were notably more accurate than polls in the 2024 US presidential election.

Forecast quality on these platforms remains high, with average Brier scores near 0.09. Accuracy also improves with growing participation, as evidenced by lower scores among markets with higher trading volume.

The more people participate, the more accurate the market becomes. That is a genuinely remarkable property.

But this technology also has a darker side that is worth being honest about.

Critics raise two concrete concerns about the growth of prediction markets. First, they are vulnerable to manipulation by anonymous insiders who know things the market does not. Second, they risk exacerbating problem gambling, especially among young men who are among the primary targets of the platforms' promotional efforts.

The insider trading angle is particularly troubling. An anonymous user on Polymarket netted a profit of more than $630,000 with a series of fortuitously timed bets forecasting US and Israeli attacks on Iran, including a $123,300 profit on a bet placed shortly before the attacks occurred. Kalshi opened 200 investigations of possible market manipulation over the last year and it remains unclear whether insider trading in prediction markets is even illegal the way it is in securities markets.

Then there is the question of what it does to society when everything becomes a bet. Many people object to users' ability to bet on death and destruction, including contracts on the assassination of foreign leaders or the outbreak of war.

These are not hypothetical concerns. They are happening right now.

This is the question most Indian readers will be asking.

Prediction markets in their current form are primarily US-regulated products. Kalshi requires US residency and Polymarket is still in the process of US expansion. For Indian users, direct access to these platforms sits in a legal grey zone similar to crypto generally.

But the concept itself is coming here regardless. The intersection of cricket, elections, and India's massive online gaming and fantasy sports industry makes prediction markets an almost inevitable arrival. If you follow Dream11 or My11Circle, you already understand the basic psychology. Prediction markets are simply a broader version of that same instinct applied to the entire world.

What to watch for: Indian regulatory frameworks around online gaming and derivatives are evolving fast, and prediction markets will eventually land in that conversation in a significant way.

Honestly, it is both. And that tension is exactly what makes it interesting.

Critics argue these are gambling sites no different than a casino. The platforms themselves argue they enable people to turn their informed opinions into a financial instrument, hedging against real world events. Traditional gambling means wagering against the house where the casino maintains a competitive edge. Prediction markets work differently, with participants trading against each other and prices set by collective belief rather than a bookmaker.

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. For most casual users it functions like gambling. For sophisticated participants with genuine information advantages it functions like trading. And for researchers and forecasters it functions like the most accurate polling tool ever invented.

What it definitely is not is going away.

Capital is staying in prediction markets longer, with combined open interest increasing from about $3.3 billion to nearly $13 billion in a single year. During 2025, economic markets expanded by around ten times while tech and science markets grew by more than seventeen times.

The world is turning its opinions into money. Whether that is a good thing or a complicated one, you are going to want to understand how it works.

Now you do.

— Roo